daffodils: come up blind

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bulb
Weight: 0.50
, flower
Weight: 0.49
, perennial
Weight: 0.45
, narcissus
Weight: 0.36
Siblings crocus
Weight: 0.34
, hydrangea
Weight: 0.34
, daffodil
Weight: 0.34
, tulip
Weight: 0.33
, aster
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
come up blind 1.00
go blind 0.94
is blind 0.92
be blind year 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bulb, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(daffodils, come up blind)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(bulb, come up blind)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.58
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bulb, come up blind)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, go blind)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bulb, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(daffodils, come up blind)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(hydrangea, go blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hydrangea, go blind)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(daffodils, come up blind)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(daffodils, go blind)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daffodils, go blind)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, go blind)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, is blind)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(daffodils, is blind)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(daffodils, is blind)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, be blind year)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(daffodils, be blind year)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(daffodils, be blind year)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(daffodils, go blind)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(daffodils, is blind)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(daffodils, be blind year)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, come up blind)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(daffodils, come up blind)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(bulb, come up blind)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(hydrangea, go blind)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(daffodils, come up blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(bulb, come up blind)