daffodils: use energy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bulb
Weight: 0.50
, flower
Weight: 0.49
, perennial
Weight: 0.45
, narcissus
Weight: 0.36
Siblings crocus
Weight: 0.34
, hydrangea
Weight: 0.34
, daffodil
Weight: 0.34
, tulip
Weight: 0.33
, aster
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
use energy 1.00
save energy 0.83
help residential energy effiecency 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(bulb, save energy)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(daffodils, use energy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bulb, help residential energy effiecency)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(daffodils, use energy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(daffodils, use energy)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(bulb, save energy)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(daffodils, use energy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(bulb, help residential energy effiecency)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, use energy)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(bulb, help residential energy effiecency)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, use energy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bulb, save energy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(bulb, save energy)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(daffodils, use energy)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(daffodils, use energy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bulb, help residential energy effiecency)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(daffodils, use energy)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(daffodils, use energy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(daffodils, use energy)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(daffodils, use energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(daffodils, use energy)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(daffodils, use energy)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, use energy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(daffodils, use energy)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(daffodils, use energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, use energy)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(bulb, save energy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, use energy)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(bulb, help residential energy effiecency)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(daffodils, use energy)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(bulb, save energy)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(daffodils, use energy)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(bulb, help residential energy effiecency)