dam: fall

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, site
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings bridge
Weight: 0.35
, construction site
Weight: 0.34
, dike
Weight: 0.34
, levee
Weight: 0.33
, creek
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
fall 1.00
carry cars falling 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(dam, fall)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bridge, carry cars falling)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dam, fall)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(bridge, carry cars falling)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(bridge, carry cars falling)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dam, fall)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(dam, fall)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(dam, fall)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(dam, fall)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(dam, fall)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dam, fall)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(dam, fall)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(dam, fall)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(bridge, carry cars falling)