damage: be prevented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.63
, abnormality
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, sum
Weight: 0.57
Siblings rust
Weight: 0.63
, breaking
Weight: 0.59
, erosion
Weight: 0.58
, tear
Weight: 0.57
, windshield
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be prevented 1.00
be prevented during free diving 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(damage, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be prevented)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(damage, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rust, be prevented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(damage, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(rust, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(rust, be prevented)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(damage, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(erosion, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(erosion, be prevented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(damage, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(damage, be prevented)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(damage, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(damage, be prevented during free diving)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(damage, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(damage, be prevented during free diving)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(damage, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(damage, be prevented during free diving)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(damage, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(damage, be prevented during free diving)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(damage, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(damage, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(damage, be prevented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(damage, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(damage, be prevented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(damage, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(erosion, be prevented)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(damage, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rust, be prevented)