dancer: have big butts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.73
, woman
Weight: 0.63
, athlete
Weight: 0.63
, musician
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ballerina
Weight: 0.79
, ballet dancer
Weight: 0.51
, barre
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big butts 1.00
have big legs 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, have big butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dancer, have big butts)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dancer, have big butts) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(woman, have big butts)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have big butts) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(woman, have big butts)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, have big butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dancer, have big butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(dancer, have big butts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dancer, have big butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(dancer, have big butts)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(dancer, have big butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(dancer, have big legs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dancer, have big butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(dancer, have big legs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(dancer, have big butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(dancer, have big legs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dancer, have big butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have big legs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(dancer, have big butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dancer, have big butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have big butts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dancer, have big butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dancer, have big butts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have big butts) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, have big butts)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(dancer, have big butts) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, have big butts)