dancer: stand on toes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.73
, woman
Weight: 0.63
, athlete
Weight: 0.63
, musician
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ballerina
Weight: 0.79
, ballet dancer
Weight: 0.51
, barre
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
stand on toes 1.00
have big legs 0.79
have thick legs 0.75
has physical part legs 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(dancer, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, stand on toes)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(dancer, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, stand on toes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(dancer, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, has physical part legs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dancer, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(ballerina, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(ballerina, stand on toes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dancer, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ballet dancer, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, stand on toes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dancer, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(ballerina, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(ballerina, has physical part legs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dancer, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(dancer, stand on toes)

Similarity expansion

0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(dancer, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(dancer, have big legs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dancer, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(dancer, have big legs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(dancer, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have big legs)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(dancer, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(dancer, have big legs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(dancer, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dancer, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(dancer, stand on toes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dancer, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dancer, stand on toes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(dancer, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ballerina, stand on toes)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(dancer, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, stand on toes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(dancer, stand on toes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(ballerina, has physical part legs)