dancer: take ice baths

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.73
, woman
Weight: 0.63
, athlete
Weight: 0.63
, musician
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ballerina
Weight: 0.79
, ballet dancer
Weight: 0.51
, barre
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
take ice baths 1.00
put in ice water 0.82
ice feet 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dancer, take ice baths)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, put in ice water)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dancer, take ice baths)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, ice feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dancer, take ice baths)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, ice feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dancer, take ice baths)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(ballet dancer, put in ice water)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, put in ice water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dancer, take ice baths)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(ballerina, ice feet)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(ballerina, ice feet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dancer, take ice baths)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(ballet dancer, ice feet)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, ice feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dancer, take ice baths)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(dancer, take ice baths)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dancer, take ice baths)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(dancer, ice feet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(dancer, take ice baths)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(dancer, ice feet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(dancer, take ice baths)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(dancer, ice feet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(dancer, take ice baths)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(dancer, ice feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(dancer, take ice baths)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(dancer, take ice baths)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dancer, take ice baths)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dancer, take ice baths)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(dancer, take ice baths)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dancer, take ice baths)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, put in ice water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dancer, take ice baths)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ballerina, ice feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dancer, take ice baths)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, ice feet)