dancing: be stars on two nights

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents entertainment
Weight: 0.64
, act
Weight: 0.61
, way
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings dance
Weight: 0.36
, singing
Weight: 0.35
, folk music
Weight: 0.34
, music
Weight: 0.34
, loud music
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stars on two nights 1.00
be with stars 4 weeks 0.85
be with stars 0.84
match up stars with dancers 0.76
be with stars blind 0.76
match up stars with pro dancers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(dancing, be stars on two nights)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(dancing, be with stars 4 weeks)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(dancing, be with stars)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dancing, be with stars 4 weeks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(dancing, be with stars)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(dancing, be with stars 4 weeks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(dancing, match up stars with dancers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(dancing, match up stars with pro dancers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(dancing, be with stars 4 weeks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dancing, match up stars with dancers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dancing, match up stars with pro dancers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(dancing, be with stars)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(dancing, be with stars)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(dancing, match up stars with dancers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(dancing, match up stars with pro dancers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dancing, match up stars with pro dancers)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dancing, match up stars with dancers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(dancing, be stars on two nights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(dancing, be stars on two nights)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dancing, be stars on two nights)