danny: was going give

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.56
, guy
Weight: 0.52
, boy
Weight: 0.51
, figure
Weight: 0.51
Siblings gordon
Weight: 0.35
, david
Weight: 0.34
, paul
Weight: 0.34
, sarah
Weight: 0.34
, johnson
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was going give 1.00
keep saying 0.76
say i 'm 0.76
etling doing 0.75
be worsnop back in aa 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(danny, was going give) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(danny, was going give)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(danny, was going give) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(danny, say i 'm)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(danny, was going give) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(danny, etling doing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(danny, was going give) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(danny, say i 'm)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(danny, was going give) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(danny, be worsnop back in aa)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(danny, was going give) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(danny, etling doing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(danny, was going give) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(danny, etling doing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(danny, was going give) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(danny, say i 'm)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(danny, was going give) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(danny, be worsnop back in aa)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(danny, was going give) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(danny, etling doing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(danny, was going give) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(danny, say i 'm)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(danny, was going give) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(danny, be worsnop back in aa)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(danny, was going give) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(danny, be worsnop back in aa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(danny, was going give) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(danny, was going give) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(danny, was going give)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(danny, was going give) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(danny, was going give)