daphne: go to jail

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.46
, thing
Weight: 0.42
, mom
Weight: 0.41
, girl
Weight: 0.40
, hero
Weight: 0.40
Siblings daisy
Weight: 0.30
, lily
Weight: 0.30
, laurel
Weight: 0.30
, phoebe
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
go to jail 1.00
be on probation 0.79
be on probation switched 0.76
have probation officer 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(lily, go to jail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(lily, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(lily, go to jail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(daphne, go to jail)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(daphne, be on probation switched)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(daphne, be on probation switched)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(daphne, be on probation)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(daphne, be on probation)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(daphne, be on probation switched)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(daphne, be on probation)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(daphne, be on probation)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(daphne, be on probation switched)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(daphne, have probation officer)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(daphne, have probation officer)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(daphne, have probation officer)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(daphne, have probation officer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(daphne, go to jail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(daphne, go to jail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(daphne, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(lily, go to jail)