data: be at database

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.53
, service
Weight: 0.52
, tool
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, form
Weight: 0.47
Siblings computer network
Weight: 0.32
, information
Weight: 0.32
, database
Weight: 0.32
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.31
, technology
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at database 1.00
be organize into file record and database 0.89
list information 0.76
be used to store data 0.76
be make up of data 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(data, be at database)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(information, be make up of data)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(data, be at database)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(database, be used to store data)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(data, be at database)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(database, list information)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(data, be at database)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(database, be used to store data)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(database, be used to store data)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(data, be at database)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(database, list information)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(database, list information)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(data, be at database)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(information, be make up of data)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(information, be make up of data)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(data, be at database)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(data, be at database)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(data, be at database)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(data, be organize into file record and database)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(data, be at database)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(data, be organize into file record and database)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(data, be at database)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(data, be organize into file record and database)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(data, be at database)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(data, be organize into file record and database)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(data, be at database)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(data, be at database)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(data, be at database)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(data, be at database)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(data, be at database)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(data, be at database)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(database, list information)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(data, be at database)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(database, be used to store data)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(data, be at database)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(information, be make up of data)