data: be organized into graphs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.53
, service
Weight: 0.52
, tool
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, form
Weight: 0.47
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.32
, statistics
Weight: 0.32
, information
Weight: 0.32
, database
Weight: 0.32
, mapping
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be organized into graphs 1.00
be organized in graphs 0.99
be organized into tables 0.84
be organized in spreadsheet 0.83
be organized in tables 0.82
be organized into graphs- 0.81
be organized in data model 0.79
be logically organized 0.78
be organized in hierarchical data model 0.78
be organized 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(data, be organized into graphs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(data, be organized into graphs)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(data, be organized into graphs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(data, be organized into tables)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(data, be organized into graphs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(data, be organized into tables)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(data, be organized into graphs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(data, be organized into tables)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(data, be organized into graphs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(data, be organized into tables)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(data, be organized into graphs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(data, be organized in hierarchical data model)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(data, be organized into graphs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(data, be organized in hierarchical data model)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(data, be organized into graphs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(data, be organized in hierarchical data model)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(data, be organized into graphs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(data, be organized in hierarchical data model)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(data, be organized into graphs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(data, be organized into graphs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(data, be organized into graphs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(data, be organized into graphs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(data, be organized into graphs)