dating: compare dating then

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents relationship
Weight: 0.55
, subject
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.49
Siblings marriage
Weight: 0.31
, affair
Weight: 0.31
, sex
Weight: 0.31
, friendship
Weight: 0.31
, infidelity
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare dating then 1.00
compare dating back then 0.98
compare dating 0.98
compare dating back 0.98
be different dating 0.91
dating at 19/20 0.90
be different from from dating years 0.87
be different dating in college 0.87
be more popular dating 0.87
dating at age 20 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(dating, compare dating then)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(dating, compare dating back then)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(dating, compare dating)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(dating, compare dating back)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(dating, be different dating)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(dating, compare dating)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(dating, compare dating back)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(dating, compare dating)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(dating, compare dating back then)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(dating, be different from from dating years)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dating, be different dating in college)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dating, compare dating back then)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dating, compare dating back)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(dating, compare dating)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(dating, be different dating)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(dating, compare dating back)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dating, be different dating in college)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dating, be different dating)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(dating, be different from from dating years)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(dating, be different dating in college)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dating, be different from from dating years)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dating, be different dating)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dating, compare dating back then)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(dating, be different from from dating years)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dating, be different dating in college)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(dating, compare dating then)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dating, compare dating then)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(dating, compare dating then)