dating: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents relationship
Weight: 0.55
, subject
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.49
Siblings marriage
Weight: 0.31
, affair
Weight: 0.31
, sex
Weight: 0.31
, friendship
Weight: 0.31
, infidelity
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality wrong 0.83
has quality nick 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(marriage, has quality wrong)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sex, has quality wrong)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sex, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(marriage, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(friendship, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(marriage, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(marriage, has quality better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(friendship, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(friendship, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sex, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(sex, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(infidelity, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(infidelity, has quality wrong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sex, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(sex, has quality wrong)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(marriage, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(marriage, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(dating, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(dating, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(dating, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(dating, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(dating, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(dating, has quality nick)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dating, has quality nick)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(dating, has quality nick)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(dating, has quality nick)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dating, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dating, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(friendship, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(infidelity, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(marriage, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(marriage, has quality wrong)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(sex, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dating, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(sex, has quality wrong)