dating: was in 1960

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents relationship
Weight: 0.55
, subject
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.49
Siblings marriage
Weight: 0.31
, affair
Weight: 0.31
, sex
Weight: 0.31
, friendship
Weight: 0.31
, infidelity
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
was in 1960 1.00
be in 2018 0.83
was when great 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dating, was in 1960)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(dating, was in 1960)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(dating, was in 1960)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dating, be in 2018)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(dating, was in 1960)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(dating, be in 2018)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dating, was in 1960)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(dating, be in 2018)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(dating, was in 1960)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(dating, was when great)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(dating, was in 1960)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(dating, was when great)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dating, was in 1960)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(dating, was when great)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(dating, was in 1960)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(dating, be in 2018)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(dating, was in 1960)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(dating, was when great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(dating, was in 1960)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dating, was in 1960)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dating, was in 1960)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dating, was in 1960)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dating, was in 1960)