daughter: be closer to dads

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents young woman
Weight: 0.78
, young girl
Weight: 0.76
, girl
Weight: 0.66
, child
Weight: 0.65
Siblings son
Weight: 0.68
, grandmother
Weight: 0.66
, wife
Weight: 0.64
, bride
Weight: 0.61
, kate
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be closer to dads 1.00
be closer to fathers 0.94
love much dads 0.89
love dads 0.89
be close to fathers 0.86
love more fathers 0.84
be with fathers 0.83
need fathers 0.82
love much fathers 0.82
love fathers 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(son, be closer to fathers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(son, need fathers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(son, be closer to fathers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(son, be closer to fathers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(son, need fathers)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(son, need fathers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(daughter, be closer to dads)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(daughter, be closer to fathers)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(daughter, be closer to fathers)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be closer to fathers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(daughter, be closer to fathers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(daughter, be close to fathers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(daughter, be close to fathers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(daughter, love more fathers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daughter, be with fathers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(daughter, love more fathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(daughter, be with fathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daughter, love more fathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be close to fathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with fathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daughter, need fathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(daughter, need fathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(daughter, love dads)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(daughter, love fathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(daughter, be close to fathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(daughter, love fathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(daughter, need fathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daughter, love fathers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(daughter, love much fathers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(daughter, love dads)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(daughter, be with fathers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(daughter, love much fathers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(daughter, need fathers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(daughter, love more fathers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(daughter, love much fathers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(daughter, love dads)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(daughter, love dads)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(daughter, love fathers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(daughter, love much fathers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(daughter, love much dads)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(daughter, love much dads)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(daughter, love much dads)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(daughter, love much dads)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be closer to dads)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(daughter, be closer to dads)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(son, be closer to fathers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be closer to dads)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(son, need fathers)