day: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents independence day
Weight: 0.80
, rainy day
Weight: 0.76
, sunny day
Weight: 0.61
, calendar day
Weight: 0.55
Siblings veterans day
Weight: 0.80
, labor day
Weight: 0.80
, columbus day
Weight: 0.77
, memorial day
Weight: 0.75
, earth day
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
is bad quality 0.98
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
is later bad quality 0.86
has quality worst 0.83
is later quality 0.76
sound terrible 0.76
has quality jokes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(rainy day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(day, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(rainy day, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(rainy day, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(labor day, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(columbus day, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(columbus day, has quality jokes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(rainy day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(day, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(labor day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(labor day, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(columbus day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(columbus day, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(columbus day, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(columbus day, has quality jokes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(day, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(day, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(day, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(day, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(day, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(day, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(day, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(rainy day, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(labor day, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(columbus day, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(columbus day, has quality jokes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(rainy day, has quality good)