dc: is humid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.55
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.34
, washington
Weight: 0.34
, voltage
Weight: 0.34
, las vegas
Weight: 0.34
, cleveland
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is humid 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dc, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is humid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dc, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is humid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dc, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is humid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dc, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cleveland, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cleveland, is humid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dc, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(las vegas, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is humid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dc, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(new york city, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(new york city, is humid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dc, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(dc, is humid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(dc, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dc, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dc, is humid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dc, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dc, is humid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dc, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cleveland, is humid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dc, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(las vegas, is humid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dc, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(new york city, is humid)