deadwood: is hotels

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents show
Weight: 0.60
, city
Weight: 0.54
, series
Weight: 0.54
, tv show
Weight: 0.51
, movie
Weight: 0.51
Siblings weed
Weight: 0.32
, fringe
Weight: 0.31
, scrub
Weight: 0.30
, fresh air
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hotels 1.00
is friendly hotels 0.91
is pet hotels 0.90
is pet friendly hotels 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(deadwood, is hotels)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(deadwood, is hotels)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(deadwood, is hotels)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(deadwood, is friendly hotels)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(deadwood, is hotels)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(deadwood, is friendly hotels)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(deadwood, is hotels)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(deadwood, is friendly hotels)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(deadwood, is hotels)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(deadwood, is pet friendly hotels)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(deadwood, is hotels)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(deadwood, is pet friendly hotels)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(deadwood, is hotels)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(deadwood, is friendly hotels)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(deadwood, is hotels)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(deadwood, is pet friendly hotels)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(deadwood, is hotels)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(deadwood, is pet hotels)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(deadwood, is hotels)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(deadwood, is pet friendly hotels)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(deadwood, is hotels)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(deadwood, is pet hotels)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(deadwood, is hotels)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(deadwood, is pet hotels)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(deadwood, is hotels)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(deadwood, is pet hotels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(deadwood, is hotels)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(deadwood, is hotels)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(deadwood, is hotels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(deadwood, is hotels)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(deadwood, is hotels)