deaf people: convey thoughts to themselves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents everyone
Weight: 0.55
, culture
Weight: 0.45
, group
Weight: 0.39
, college
Weight: 0.35
, part
Weight: 0.32
Siblings blind people
Weight: 0.34
, poor people
Weight: 0.29
, folk music
Weight: 0.29
, children
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
convey thoughts to themselves 1.00
have thoughts 0.86
interpret words 0.76
communicate in dark 0.76
talk to themselves 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, convey thoughts to themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(blind people, have thoughts)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(deaf people, convey thoughts to themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(blind people, have thoughts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(blind people, have thoughts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(deaf people, convey thoughts to themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(deaf people, convey thoughts to themselves)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(deaf people, convey thoughts to themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(deaf people, talk to themselves)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(deaf people, convey thoughts to themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, talk to themselves)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(deaf people, convey thoughts to themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(deaf people, talk to themselves)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(deaf people, convey thoughts to themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(deaf people, communicate in dark)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(deaf people, convey thoughts to themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(deaf people, communicate in dark)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(deaf people, convey thoughts to themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(deaf people, communicate in dark)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(deaf people, convey thoughts to themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(deaf people, talk to themselves)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(deaf people, convey thoughts to themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, communicate in dark)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(deaf people, convey thoughts to themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(deaf people, convey thoughts to themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, convey thoughts to themselves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(deaf people, convey thoughts to themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(deaf people, convey thoughts to themselves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, convey thoughts to themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(blind people, have thoughts)