deaf people: want have

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents everyone
Weight: 0.55
, culture
Weight: 0.45
, group
Weight: 0.39
, college
Weight: 0.35
, part
Weight: 0.32
Siblings blind people
Weight: 0.34
, poor people
Weight: 0.29
, folk music
Weight: 0.29
, children
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
want have 1.00
think to themselves 0.82
do other shit 0.78
be able 0.77
know when stop 0.76
talk to themselves 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, want have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(blind people, know when stop)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, want have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(blind people, be able)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(deaf people, want have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(blind people, be able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(blind people, be able)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(deaf people, want have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(blind people, know when stop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(blind people, know when stop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(deaf people, want have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(deaf people, want have)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(deaf people, want have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(deaf people, think to themselves)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(deaf people, want have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(deaf people, think to themselves)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(deaf people, want have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(deaf people, know when stop)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(deaf people, want have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(deaf people, know when stop)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(deaf people, want have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(deaf people, think to themselves)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(deaf people, want have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(deaf people, want have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, want have)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(deaf people, want have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(deaf people, want have)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, want have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(blind people, know when stop)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, want have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(blind people, be able)