deal: be with hackers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents acquisition
Weight: 0.65
, partnership
Weight: 0.62
, package
Weight: 0.62
, contract
Weight: 0.59
Siblings merger
Weight: 0.69
, plea bargain
Weight: 0.65
, trade
Weight: 0.65
, free
Weight: 0.58
, breakthrough
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with hackers 1.00
be with spoofers 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(deal, be with hackers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(deal, be with hackers)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(deal, be with hackers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(deal, be with spoofers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(deal, be with hackers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(deal, be with spoofers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(deal, be with hackers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(deal, be with spoofers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(deal, be with hackers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(deal, be with spoofers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(deal, be with hackers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(deal, be with hackers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(deal, be with hackers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(deal, be with hackers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(deal, be with hackers)