deal: be with parents

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents acquisition
Weight: 0.65
, partnership
Weight: 0.62
, package
Weight: 0.62
, contract
Weight: 0.59
Siblings merger
Weight: 0.69
, plea bargain
Weight: 0.65
, trade
Weight: 0.65
, free
Weight: 0.58
, breakthrough
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with parents 1.00
be with mom 0.81
be with infant loss in family 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(partnership, be with parents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(deal, be with parents)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(deal, be with parents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(partnership, be with parents)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(deal, be with parents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be with parents)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(partnership, be with parents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(deal, be with parents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(deal, be with parents)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(deal, be with parents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(deal, be with parents)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(deal, be with parents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(deal, be with mom)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(deal, be with parents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(deal, be with mom)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(deal, be with parents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(deal, be with infant loss in family)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(deal, be with parents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(deal, be with infant loss in family)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(deal, be with parents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(deal, be with mom)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(deal, be with parents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(deal, be with parents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(deal, be with parents)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(deal, be with parents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(deal, be with parents)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(deal, be with parents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(partnership, be with parents)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(deal, be with parents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(partnership, be with parents)