death: be viewed on day of dead

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fatality
Weight: 0.76
, penalty
Weight: 0.66
, trauma
Weight: 0.66
, sorrow
Weight: 0.65
Siblings divorce
Weight: 0.60
, imprisonment
Weight: 0.34
, capital punishment
Weight: 0.34
, execution
Weight: 0.33
, punishment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be viewed on day of dead 1.00
be viewed on day 0.91
were viewed in times 0.85
were viewed in medieval times 0.80
was viewed in egypt 0.79
be seen as bad by most people 0.78
be seen as bad by people 0.77
was viewed in ancient egypt 0.77
be considered worse than death 0.76
be seen as thing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(death, be viewed on day of dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(divorce, be considered worse than death)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(death, be viewed on day of dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(divorce, be considered worse than death) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(divorce, be considered worse than death)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(death, be viewed on day of dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(death, be viewed on day of dead)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(death, be viewed on day of dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(death, were viewed in medieval times)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(death, be viewed on day of dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(death, were viewed in medieval times)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(death, be viewed on day of dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(death, were viewed in medieval times)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(death, be viewed on day of dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(death, was viewed in ancient egypt)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(death, be viewed on day of dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(death, was viewed in ancient egypt)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(death, be viewed on day of dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(death, was viewed in ancient egypt)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(death, be viewed on day of dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(death, were viewed in medieval times)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(death, be viewed on day of dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(death, was viewed in ancient egypt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(death, be viewed on day of dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(death, be viewed on day of dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(death, be viewed on day of dead)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(death, be viewed on day of dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(death, be viewed on day of dead)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(death, be viewed on day of dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(divorce, be considered worse than death)