decay: affect placement

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.61
, hazard
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.53
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings beta decay
Weight: 0.57
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.36
, alpha decay
Weight: 0.34
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decomposition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect placement 1.00
affect season 's placements 0.83
affect next season 's placements 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(decay, affect placement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(decay, affect placement)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(decay, affect placement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(decay, affect season 's placements)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(decay, affect placement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(decay, affect next season 's placements)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(decay, affect placement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(decay, affect season 's placements)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(decay, affect placement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(decay, affect next season 's placements)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(decay, affect placement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(decay, affect next season 's placements)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(decay, affect placement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(decay, affect season 's placements)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(decay, affect placement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(decay, affect season 's placements)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(decay, affect placement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(decay, affect next season 's placements)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(decay, affect placement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(decay, affect placement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(decay, affect placement)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(decay, affect placement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(decay, affect placement)