decay: be important in carbon cycle

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.61
, hazard
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.53
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings beta decay
Weight: 0.57
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.36
, alpha decay
Weight: 0.34
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decomposition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in carbon cycle 1.00
be important to carbon cycle 1.00
be useful in carbon cycle 0.97
be related to carbon cycle 0.97
be important in nitrogen cycle 0.86
be important to nitrogen cycle 0.86
produce carbon dioxide 0.84
happen in cycle pattern 0.77
produce variations of water cycle 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(process, happen in cycle pattern)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(process, produce variations of water cycle)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(decay, be important in carbon cycle)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(process, produce variations of water cycle)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(process, happen in cycle pattern)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(process, produce variations of water cycle)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(process, happen in cycle pattern)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to carbon cycle)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be related to carbon cycle)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to nitrogen cycle)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, produce carbon dioxide)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(process, happen in cycle pattern)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(process, produce variations of water cycle)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(decay, be important in carbon cycle)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to carbon cycle)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(decomposition, produce carbon dioxide)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(decomposition, produce carbon dioxide)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(decomposition, be related to carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be related to carbon cycle)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to nitrogen cycle)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to nitrogen cycle)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(decay, be important in carbon cycle)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(decay, be useful in carbon cycle)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(decay, be useful in carbon cycle)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(decay, be useful in carbon cycle)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(decay, be useful in carbon cycle)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in nitrogen cycle)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(decay, be important in nitrogen cycle)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(decay, be important in nitrogen cycle)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(decay, be important in nitrogen cycle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in carbon cycle)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(decay, be important in carbon cycle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(process, happen in cycle pattern)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(process, produce variations of water cycle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to carbon cycle)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(decomposition, be related to carbon cycle)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(decomposition, produce carbon dioxide)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to nitrogen cycle)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(process, produce variations of water cycle)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(decay, be important in carbon cycle)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(process, happen in cycle pattern)