decay: be slow in tundra

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.61
, hazard
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.53
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings beta decay
Weight: 0.57
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.36
, alpha decay
Weight: 0.34
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decomposition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be slow in tundra 1.00
is slow 0.79
be in bogs 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(decay, be slow in tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, is slow)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(decay, be slow in tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be in bogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(decay, be slow in tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(decomposition, is slow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(decomposition, is slow)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(decay, be slow in tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(decomposition, be in bogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be in bogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(decay, be slow in tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(decay, be slow in tundra)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(decay, be slow in tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(decay, be slow in tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(decay, be slow in tundra)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(decay, be slow in tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(decay, be slow in tundra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(decay, be slow in tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(decomposition, is slow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(decay, be slow in tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(decomposition, be in bogs)