decay: is factor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.61
, hazard
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.53
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings beta decay
Weight: 0.57
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.36
, alpha decay
Weight: 0.34
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decomposition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is factor 1.00
affect factors 0.80
affect limiting factors 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(hazard, affect factors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(decay, is factor)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hazard, affect limiting factors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(decay, is factor)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(decay, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(hazard, affect factors)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(decay, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hazard, affect limiting factors)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(decay, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hazard, affect limiting factors)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(decay, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hazard, affect factors)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(hazard, affect factors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(decay, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(decay, is factor)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hazard, affect limiting factors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(decay, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(decay, is factor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(decay, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(decay, is factor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(decay, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(decay, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(decay, is factor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(decay, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(decay, is factor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(decay, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(hazard, affect factors)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(decay, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hazard, affect limiting factors)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(decay, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(hazard, affect factors)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(decay, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hazard, affect limiting factors)