decay: occur in desert

Related concepts

Parents	process Weight: 0.61 , hazard Weight: 0.56 , problem Weight: 0.55 , condition Weight: 0.53 , sign Weight: 0.52
Siblings	beta decay Weight: 0.57 , tooth decay Weight: 0.36 , alpha decay Weight: 0.34 , macular degeneration Weight: 0.34 , decomposition Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
occur in desert	1.00
occur	0.82
occur in business	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(problem, occur in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(decay, occur in desert)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(problem, occur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(decay, occur in desert)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(hazard, occur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(decay, occur in desert)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(hazard, occur)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(problem, occur)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(problem, occur in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(problem, occur in business)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(hazard, occur)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(problem, occur)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(decomposition, occur)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(problem, occur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(decay, occur in desert)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(problem, occur in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(decay, occur in desert)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(hazard, occur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(decay, occur in desert)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(decomposition, occur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(decomposition, occur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(decay, occur in desert)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(decay, occur)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(decay, occur)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(decay, occur)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(decay, occur)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(decay, occur in desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(decay, occur in desert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(hazard, occur)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(problem, occur)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(problem, occur in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(decomposition, occur)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(hazard, occur)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(problem, occur)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(decay, occur in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(problem, occur in business)