deck: be find in casino

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, area
Weight: 0.56
, yard
Weight: 0.56
Siblings patio
Weight: 0.60
, balcony
Weight: 0.56
, arch
Weight: 0.33
, stair
Weight: 0.33
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be find in casino 1.00
be at hotel 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(deck, be find in casino)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(balcony, be at hotel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(deck, be find in casino)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(stair, be at hotel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(deck, be find in casino)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(balcony, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(balcony, be at hotel)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(deck, be find in casino)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(stair, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(stair, be at hotel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(deck, be find in casino)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(deck, be find in casino)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(deck, be find in casino)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(deck, be find in casino)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(deck, be find in casino)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(deck, be find in casino)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(deck, be find in casino)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(deck, be find in casino)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(stair, be at hotel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(deck, be find in casino)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(balcony, be at hotel)