deck: be supposed work exactly

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.56
, application
Weight: 0.56
Siblings patio
Weight: 0.60
, balcony
Weight: 0.56
, pontoon
Weight: 0.33
, arch
Weight: 0.33
, stair
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be supposed work exactly 1.00
be supposed work 0.94
need wanted 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(feature, need wanted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(deck, be supposed work exactly)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(deck, be supposed work exactly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(feature, need wanted)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(deck, be supposed work exactly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(feature, need wanted)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(feature, need wanted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(deck, be supposed work exactly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(deck, be supposed work exactly)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(deck, be supposed work exactly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(deck, be supposed work exactly)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(deck, be supposed work exactly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(deck, be supposed work)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(deck, be supposed work exactly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(deck, be supposed work)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(deck, be supposed work exactly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(deck, be supposed work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(deck, be supposed work exactly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(deck, be supposed work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(deck, be supposed work exactly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(deck, be supposed work exactly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(deck, be supposed work exactly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(deck, be supposed work exactly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(deck, be supposed work exactly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(deck, be supposed work exactly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(feature, need wanted)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(deck, be supposed work exactly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(feature, need wanted)