deck: is wildly imbalances

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.56
, application
Weight: 0.56
Siblings patio
Weight: 0.60
, balcony
Weight: 0.56
, pontoon
Weight: 0.33
, arch
Weight: 0.33
, stair
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is wildly imbalances 1.00
is imbalances 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(deck, is wildly imbalances) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(deck, is wildly imbalances)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(deck, is wildly imbalances) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(deck, is imbalances)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(deck, is wildly imbalances) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(deck, is imbalances)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(deck, is wildly imbalances) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(deck, is imbalances)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(deck, is wildly imbalances) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(deck, is imbalances)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(deck, is wildly imbalances) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(deck, is wildly imbalances) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(deck, is wildly imbalances)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(deck, is wildly imbalances) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(deck, is wildly imbalances)