decrease: be bad in gdp

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, problem
Weight: 0.61
, change
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, amount
Weight: 0.52
Siblings reduction
Weight: 0.36
, decline
Weight: 0.36
, increase
Weight: 0.36
, drop
Weight: 0.35
, rise
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in gdp 1.00
be bad in population 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(decrease, be bad in gdp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(decline, be bad in population)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(decrease, be bad in gdp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(decline, be bad in population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(decline, be bad in population)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(decrease, be bad in gdp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(decrease, be bad in gdp)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(decrease, be bad in gdp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(decrease, be bad in population)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(decrease, be bad in gdp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(decrease, be bad in population)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(decrease, be bad in gdp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(decrease, be bad in population)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(decrease, be bad in gdp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(decrease, be bad in population)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(decrease, be bad in gdp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(decrease, be bad in gdp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(decrease, be bad in gdp)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(decrease, be bad in gdp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(decrease, be bad in gdp)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(decrease, be bad in gdp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(decline, be bad in population)