decrease: be in cash

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, problem
Weight: 0.61
, change
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, amount
Weight: 0.52
Siblings reduction
Weight: 0.36
, decline
Weight: 0.36
, increase
Weight: 0.36
, drop
Weight: 0.35
, rise
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in cash 1.00
be in money supply 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(decrease, be in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in cash)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(decrease, be in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(increase, be in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(increase, be in cash)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(decrease, be in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(decrease, be in cash)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(decrease, be in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(decrease, be in money supply)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(decrease, be in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(decrease, be in money supply)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(decrease, be in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(decrease, be in money supply)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(decrease, be in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(decrease, be in money supply)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(decrease, be in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(decrease, be in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(decrease, be in cash)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(decrease, be in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(decrease, be in cash)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(decrease, be in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(increase, be in cash)