deduction: be defined as process of use know fact to answer question

Related concepts

Parents	loophole Weight: 0.56 , payment Weight: 0.56 , thing Weight: 0.53 , cost Weight: 0.53 , issue Weight: 0.52
Siblings	deductible Weight: 0.32 , tax Weight: 0.32 , rent Weight: 0.31 , insurance Weight: 0.31 , fee Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be defined as process of use know fact to answer question	1.00
be at we do not understand	0.82
be happen without your know	0.79
do not work well	0.78
be happen all time	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(thing, be happen without your know) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(thing, be happen all time) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(thing, do not work well) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(thing, do not work well)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(thing, be happen all time)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(thing, be happen without your know)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(thing, be at we do not understand)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(thing, do not work well)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(thing, be happen without your know)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(thing, be happen all time)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(thing, be happen without your know) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(thing, do not work well) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(thing, be happen all time) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(thing, be at we do not understand)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(thing, be happen without your know)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(thing, be happen all time)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(thing, be at we do not understand)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(thing, be happen without your know)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(deduction, be defined as process of use know fact to answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(thing, be happen all time)