deer: has physical part antlers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.76
, mammal
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, creature
Weight: 0.67
, wildlife
Weight: 0.65
Siblings moose
Weight: 0.70
, elk
Weight: 0.67
, bobcat
Weight: 0.39
, cougar
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part antlers 1.00
need antlers 0.95
use antlers 0.95
have bigger antlers 0.94
drop antlers 0.93
lose antlers 0.93
grow antlers 0.93
have sets of antlers 0.92
have fur on antlers 0.92
have large sets of antlers 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(moose, drop antlers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(moose, lose antlers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(elk, drop antlers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(moose, has physical part antlers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(elk, lose antlers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(elk, grow antlers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(elk, has physical part antlers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(elk, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(elk, has physical part antlers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(moose, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(moose, has physical part antlers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(moose, drop antlers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(moose, drop antlers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(elk, grow antlers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(elk, grow antlers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(moose, lose antlers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(moose, lose antlers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(elk, lose antlers)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(elk, lose antlers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(elk, drop antlers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(elk, drop antlers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(deer, has physical part antlers)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(deer, use antlers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(deer, drop antlers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(deer, use antlers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(deer, drop antlers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(deer, lose antlers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(deer, use antlers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(deer, need antlers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(deer, drop antlers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(deer, grow antlers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(deer, grow antlers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(deer, need antlers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(deer, drop antlers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(deer, need antlers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(deer, use antlers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(deer, lose antlers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(deer, grow antlers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(deer, grow antlers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(deer, need antlers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(deer, lose antlers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(deer, lose antlers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(deer, has physical part antlers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(moose, has physical part antlers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(elk, has physical part antlers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(moose, drop antlers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(moose, lose antlers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(elk, grow antlers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(elk, drop antlers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(elk, lose antlers)