defence: is specific

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.53
, field
Weight: 0.53
, person
Weight: 0.53
, matter
Weight: 0.52
, service
Weight: 0.52
Siblings homeless person
Weight: 0.28
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.28
, football field
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
is specific 1.00
is non specific 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(defence, is specific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(defence, is specific)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(defence, is specific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(defence, is non specific)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(defence, is specific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(defence, is non specific)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(defence, is specific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(defence, is non specific)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(defence, is specific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(defence, is non specific)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(defence, is specific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(defence, is specific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(defence, is specific)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(defence, is specific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(defence, is specific)