defender: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.61
, man
Weight: 0.58
, television
Weight: 0.56
, player
Weight: 0.55
Siblings goalie
Weight: 0.49
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.35
, winger
Weight: 0.34
, striker
Weight: 0.34
, football game
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is goddamn expensive 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(defender, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(soccer ball, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(defender, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(football game, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(defender, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(football game, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(football game, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(defender, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(soccer ball, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(soccer ball, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(defender, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(defender, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(defender, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(defender, is goddamn expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(defender, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(defender, is goddamn expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(defender, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(defender, is goddamn expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(defender, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(defender, is goddamn expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(defender, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(defender, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(defender, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(defender, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(defender, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(defender, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(football game, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(defender, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(soccer ball, is expensive)