defender: score get

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.61
, man
Weight: 0.58
, television
Weight: 0.56
, player
Weight: 0.55
Siblings goalie
Weight: 0.49
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.35
, winger
Weight: 0.34
, striker
Weight: 0.34
, football game
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
score get 1.00
have score 0.98
score get if 0.94
score goals 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(defender, score get) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(defender, score get)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(defender, score get) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(defender, have score)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(defender, score get) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(defender, have score)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(defender, score get) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defender, have score)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(defender, score get) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(defender, score goals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(defender, score get) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(defender, score get if)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(defender, score get) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(defender, score get if)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(defender, score get) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(defender, have score)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(defender, score get) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(defender, score goals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(defender, score get) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(defender, score get if)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(defender, score get) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(defender, score goals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(defender, score get) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(defender, score get if)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(defender, score get) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(defender, score goals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(defender, score get) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(defender, score get) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(defender, score get)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(defender, score get) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(defender, score get)