defender: walk through wire unhindered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.61
, man
Weight: 0.58
, television
Weight: 0.56
, player
Weight: 0.55
Siblings goalie
Weight: 0.49
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.35
, winger
Weight: 0.34
, striker
Weight: 0.34
, football game
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
walk through wire unhindered 1.00
walk through unhindered 0.95
walk through barbed wire unhindered 0.93
walk through barbed unhindered 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(defender, walk through wire unhindered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(defender, walk through wire unhindered)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(defender, walk through wire unhindered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(defender, walk through unhindered)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(defender, walk through wire unhindered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(defender, walk through barbed wire unhindered)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(defender, walk through wire unhindered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(defender, walk through barbed unhindered)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(defender, walk through wire unhindered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(defender, walk through unhindered)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(defender, walk through wire unhindered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(defender, walk through unhindered)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(defender, walk through wire unhindered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(defender, walk through unhindered)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(defender, walk through wire unhindered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(defender, walk through barbed wire unhindered)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(defender, walk through wire unhindered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(defender, walk through barbed wire unhindered)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(defender, walk through wire unhindered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(defender, walk through barbed wire unhindered)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(defender, walk through wire unhindered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(defender, walk through barbed unhindered)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(defender, walk through wire unhindered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(defender, walk through barbed unhindered)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(defender, walk through wire unhindered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(defender, walk through barbed unhindered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(defender, walk through wire unhindered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(defender, walk through wire unhindered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(defender, walk through wire unhindered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(defender, walk through wire unhindered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(defender, walk through wire unhindered)