defense: be against weapons difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.62
, weakness
Weight: 0.61
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings offense
Weight: 0.33
, midfield
Weight: 0.33
, aviation
Weight: 0.32
, linebacker
Weight: 0.32
, third base
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be against weapons difficult 1.00
be against weapons 0.94
be against biological weapons difficult 0.92
be against biological weapons 0.86
is difficult 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sector, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(defense, be against weapons difficult)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sector, is difficult)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sector, is difficult)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sector, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(defense, be against weapons difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(defense, be against weapons difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(defense, be against weapons)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(defense, be against weapons)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(defense, be against biological weapons difficult)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(defense, be against weapons)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(defense, be against biological weapons difficult)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(defense, be against biological weapons)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(defense, be against biological weapons)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(defense, be against biological weapons)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(defense, be against biological weapons difficult)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(defense, be against biological weapons difficult)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(defense, be against biological weapons)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(defense, be against weapons)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(defense, be against weapons difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(defense, be against weapons difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sector, is difficult)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(defense, be against weapons difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sector, is difficult)