defense: be fucked on bottom in mount

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.62
, weakness
Weight: 0.61
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings offense
Weight: 0.33
, midfield
Weight: 0.33
, aviation
Weight: 0.32
, linebacker
Weight: 0.32
, third base
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be fucked on bottom in mount 1.00
be fucked on when bottom in mount 0.99
be fucked on bottom 0.92
be fucked on when bottom 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(defense, be fucked on bottom)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(defense, be fucked on when bottom)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(defense, be fucked on bottom)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(defense, be fucked on when bottom)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(defense, be fucked on when bottom in mount)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(defense, be fucked on when bottom in mount)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(defense, be fucked on when bottom)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(defense, be fucked on bottom)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(defense, be fucked on when bottom in mount)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(defense, be fucked on bottom)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(defense, be fucked on when bottom)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(defense, be fucked on when bottom in mount)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(defense, be fucked on bottom in mount)