defense: be on monsters

Related concepts

Parents	position Weight: 0.62 , weakness Weight: 0.61 , defense attorney Weight: 0.59 , factor Weight: 0.58 , sector Weight: 0.58
Siblings	offense Weight: 0.33 , midfield Weight: 0.33 , aviation Weight: 0.32 , linebacker Weight: 0.32 , third base Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be on monsters	1.00
be on monsters work	0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(defense, be on monsters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(defense, be on monsters)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(defense, be on monsters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(defense, be on monsters work)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.11

Salient(defense, be on monsters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Salient(defense, be on monsters work)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(defense, be on monsters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(defense, be on monsters work)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(defense, be on monsters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(defense, be on monsters work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

Salient(defense, be on monsters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(defense, be on monsters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(defense, be on monsters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(defense, be on monsters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(defense, be on monsters)