defense: is useless

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.62
, weakness
Weight: 0.61
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings offense
Weight: 0.33
, midfield
Weight: 0.33
, aviation
Weight: 0.32
, linebacker
Weight: 0.32
, third base
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useless 1.00
be worthless for pure 0.84
be useful 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, be useful)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(defense, is useless)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(defense, is useless)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(factor, be useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(defense, is useless)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(factor, be useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, be useful)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(defense, is useless)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(defense, is useless)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(defense, is useless)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(defense, is useless)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(defense, is useless)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(defense, be worthless for pure)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(defense, is useless)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(defense, be worthless for pure)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(defense, is useless)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(defense, be worthless for pure)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(defense, is useless)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(defense, be worthless for pure)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(defense, is useless)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(defense, is useless)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(defense, is useless)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(defense, is useless)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(defense, is useless)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(defense, is useless)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(factor, be useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(defense, is useless)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(factor, be useful)