deficit: be in current account

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.64
, fiscal year
Weight: 0.55
, matter
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.54
, policy
Weight: 0.53
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.32
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.32
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in current account 1.00
be in current account bad 0.97
be in account 0.95
be in account bad 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(deficit, be in current account) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(deficit, be in current account)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(deficit, be in current account) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(deficit, be in account)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(deficit, be in current account) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(deficit, be in current account bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(deficit, be in current account) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(deficit, be in current account bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(deficit, be in current account) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(deficit, be in account bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(deficit, be in current account) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(deficit, be in account)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(deficit, be in current account) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(deficit, be in account)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(deficit, be in current account) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(deficit, be in account)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(deficit, be in current account) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(deficit, be in account bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(deficit, be in current account) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(deficit, be in current account bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(deficit, be in current account) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(deficit, be in account bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(deficit, be in current account) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(deficit, be in current account bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(deficit, be in current account) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(deficit, be in account bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(deficit, be in current account) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(deficit, be in current account) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(deficit, be in current account)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(deficit, be in current account) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(deficit, be in current account)