deficit: is justified

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.64
, fiscal year
Weight: 0.55
, matter
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.54
, policy
Weight: 0.53
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.32
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.32
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is justified 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(deficit, is justified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is justified)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(deficit, is justified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(inequality, is justified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(inequality, is justified)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(deficit, is justified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(deficit, is justified)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(deficit, is justified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(deficit, is justified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(deficit, is justified)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(deficit, is justified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(deficit, is justified)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(deficit, is justified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, is justified)