delaware: be called for killary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.59
, maryland
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.55
, law
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wilmington
Weight: 0.56
, wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.34
, arkansas
Weight: 0.34
, springfield
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called for killary 1.00
be called state 0.83
be called first state 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be called for killary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be called state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(delaware, be called for killary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(arkansas, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(arkansas, be called state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(delaware, be called for killary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(delaware, be called for killary)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(delaware, be called for killary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(delaware, be called state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(delaware, be called for killary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(delaware, be called state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(delaware, be called for killary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(delaware, be called state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(delaware, be called for killary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(delaware, be called first state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(delaware, be called for killary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(delaware, be called first state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(delaware, be called for killary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(delaware, be called first state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(delaware, be called for killary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be called state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(delaware, be called for killary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be called first state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(delaware, be called for killary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(delaware, be called for killary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be called for killary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(delaware, be called for killary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(delaware, be called for killary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be called for killary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(arkansas, be called state)