delaware: be knows as state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.59
, maryland
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.55
, law
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wilmington
Weight: 0.56
, wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.34
, arkansas
Weight: 0.34
, springfield
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be knows as state 1.00
be knows as first state 0.98
is even state 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be knows as state)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wyoming, is even state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(delaware, be knows as state)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(wyoming, is even state)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(wyoming, is even state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(delaware, be knows as state)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(delaware, be knows as state)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(delaware, be knows as state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be knows as first state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(delaware, be knows as state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(delaware, is even state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(delaware, be knows as state)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(delaware, be knows as first state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(delaware, be knows as state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(delaware, is even state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(delaware, be knows as state)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(delaware, be knows as first state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(delaware, be knows as state)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(delaware, be knows as first state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(delaware, be knows as state)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delaware, is even state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(delaware, be knows as state)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(delaware, is even state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(delaware, be knows as state)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(delaware, be knows as state)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be knows as state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(delaware, be knows as state)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(delaware, be knows as state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be knows as state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wyoming, is even state)