delegate: be chosen in new york

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents official
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.56
, election
Weight: 0.54
, ticket
Weight: 0.50
Siblings james wilson
Weight: 0.49
, general election
Weight: 0.33
, senator
Weight: 0.32
, observer
Weight: 0.32
, diplomat
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be chosen in new york 1.00
be chosen in york 0.98
get chosen 0.78
be chosen 0.78
be chosen again 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(senator, be chosen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(senator, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(senator, be chosen)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(delegate, be chosen in new york)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(delegate, be chosen in york)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(delegate, be chosen in york)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(delegate, be chosen in york)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(delegate, be chosen in york)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(delegate, get chosen)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(delegate, be chosen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(delegate, be chosen again)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(delegate, be chosen)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(delegate, get chosen)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(delegate, be chosen)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(delegate, be chosen again)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(delegate, get chosen)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(delegate, be chosen again)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(delegate, be chosen)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(delegate, get chosen)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(delegate, be chosen again)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(delegate, be chosen in new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(delegate, be chosen in new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(delegate, be chosen in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(senator, be chosen)