delegate: were to convention chosen

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents official
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.56
, election
Weight: 0.54
, ticket
Weight: 0.50
Siblings james wilson
Weight: 0.49
, general election
Weight: 0.33
, senator
Weight: 0.32
, observer
Weight: 0.32
, diplomat
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
were to convention chosen 1.00
be chosen for convention 0.99
be chosen for national convention 0.95
were to convention 0.94
were to constitutional convention chosen 0.92
were to constitutional convention 0.86
pass vote at national convention 0.83
pass vote at convention 0.83
be needed at conventions 0.81
be chosen 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(senator, be chosen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(senator, be chosen)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(senator, be chosen)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(delegate, were to convention chosen)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(delegate, be chosen for convention)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(delegate, be chosen for national convention)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(delegate, were to convention)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(delegate, were to convention)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(delegate, were to constitutional convention chosen)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(delegate, were to constitutional convention)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(delegate, pass vote at national convention)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(delegate, pass vote at convention)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(delegate, be needed at conventions)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(delegate, be chosen for convention)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(delegate, be chosen)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(delegate, were to convention)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(delegate, be chosen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(delegate, be needed at conventions)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(delegate, were to convention)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(delegate, be chosen for convention)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(delegate, be chosen)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(delegate, be chosen for convention)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(delegate, be chosen)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(delegate, were to constitutional convention chosen)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(delegate, were to constitutional convention chosen)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(delegate, were to constitutional convention chosen)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(delegate, be chosen for national convention)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(delegate, be needed at conventions)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(delegate, were to constitutional convention)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(delegate, were to constitutional convention)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(delegate, were to constitutional convention)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(delegate, pass vote at convention)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(delegate, be chosen for national convention)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(delegate, pass vote at national convention)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(delegate, be chosen for national convention)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(delegate, be needed at conventions)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(delegate, pass vote at convention)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(delegate, pass vote at national convention)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(delegate, pass vote at convention)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(delegate, pass vote at national convention)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(delegate, were to convention chosen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(delegate, were to convention chosen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(delegate, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(senator, be chosen)